Recently in Ben Kingsley Category

SHUTTER ISLAND (2010)

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

ShutterIslanddvdcover.jpgStarring: Leonardo DiCaprio, Mark Ruffalo, Emily Mortimer, Ben Kingsley, Max Von Sydow, Ted Levine, Jackie Earle Haley, Patricia Clarkson Drama/Suspense. Directed by Martin Scorsese. Synopsis: In 1950's Massachusetts, a U.S. Marshal and his partner are sent to an island off the coast of the mainland to investigate the disappearance of a woman convicted of murder from a hospital for the criminally insane when he begins to suspect that there is something secretly evil happening at the hospital and he is determined to find out what it is and to stop it.

Very, very powerful adaptation of a novel that is visually stunning and disturbing in one of Scorsese's best, in my opinion, which is saying a hell of a lot.

First, Shutter Island just looks creepy, uncomfortable, and disturbing which, of course, is the way its supposed to look. This is important because, right from the get go, you get a sense of foreboding as two U.S. Marshals, Teddy Daniels (Leonardo DiCaprio Gangs Of New York)   and Chuck Aule (Mark Ruffalo The Zodiac) are bouncing around on a little boat on their way out to the island, a prison for the criminally insane, where they are going to investigate the mysterious disappearance of a female inmate who is alleged to have drowned her children. (Emily Mortimer The Pink Panther

Right from the beginning the tension between the staaff and our Marshals is palpable, we get the feeling something else is going on here, but what? What are the people who are running this island asylum for the insane trying to hide? No creepy film noir psycho thriller set in a asylum for the criminally insane  would be complete without 1) a hellacious thunderstorm which basically puts the place in lockdown mode 2) menancing, yet debonair doctors. We have both in Shutter Island

And, our two creepy doctors literally couldn't be any better, with one being the evident sadistic genius behind whatever is going on (Ben Kingsley Suspect Zero)  and, of course the evil former Nazi doctor (Max Von Sydow The Exorcist

You need to understand that this is a hard movie to review in the sense of doing it justice. You will realize early on that you are to see this entire story unfold from Teddy's point of view, complete with the violent and disturbing flashbacks to his experiences in World War II. I will repeat that little clue once more because it's important...you're seeing everything from Teddy's point of view.

Is there a "twist" or big time "reveal" coming in this one? Of course there is, but you'll know that from the second the opening credits roll. The key to an effective psychological thriller that will stand the test of time, in my opinion, is this: let's say you firgure out or guess the 'reveal' before the end of the flick...will you still enjoy the movie? I don't think there is any question that answer is a yes for Shutter Island.  Now, having said that, I didn't figure out the 'twist' early, though I can say I wasn't far off and I'm sure that some of you will guess it early on...my point is I believe that is no fault of the movie, which does, in my opinion stay faithful to the twist and you'll find it to be consistent upon a second viewing.

The aacting is wonderful but I don't want to waste too much of your precious time telling you the obvious: Kingsley, Von Sydow, and DiCaprio are wonderful actors, yada yada....you know that and they don't disappoint.

I do think a special shout out is due, however for the scene stealing performances of two well known character actors whose relatively small parts were essential to the story. Jackie Earle Haley (Fragments) and Patricia Clarkson (The Woods) are exceptional during their short time on screen.

I also think Mr. Ruffalo's somewhat understated and reactive performance can be appreciated much more after the twist is made clear to the viewer.

A solid thriller from one of the best directors walking around out there. A solid must see, in my opinion.

LUCKY NUMBER SLEVIN (2006)

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
luckynumberslevindvdcover.jpg

Starring: Josh Hartnett, Bruce Willis, Ben Kingsley, Morgan Freeman, Lucy Liu, Stanley Tucci, Mykelti Williamson, Danny Aiello, Robert Forster.Drama Directed by Paul McGuigan Synopsis: A young guy looking to visit his childhood friend gets caught up in a dispute between two powerful gangsters who both mistake him for his friend and both say he owes them a great deal of money.
 
The mistaken-identity- getting- the-star into trouble is a proven effective vehicle for a good flick. In fact, this movie actually references perhaps the most famous film to come out of this sub genre  so it's quite possible the flick is meant as an homage to the greatest of the Hitchcockian films.
 
I'm not sure about that, but what I do know is that Lucky Number Slevin works, and I think it works because you really don't have a sense of where its ultimately going, but you're enjoying the ride the whole way.
 
Slevin (Josh Hartnett Sin City)  is a guy who is in town to visit his buddy, Nick Fisher. It's been a tough couple of days for Nick, what with him finding out his apartment has been condemned, catching his girlfriend with another man, and getting mugged and losing his wallet and ID.
 
But, its going to get worse...see, Nick is nowhere to be found and there are a couple of gangsters who really want to see Nick, whom they think is Slevin. And, these aren't just any two gangsters, but the two biggest ones in town, The Boss (Morgan Freeman An Unfinished Life) and The Rabbi (Ben Kingsley Shutter Island). There is one other little thing. Although the Boss and the Rabbi used to be tight, they are now mortal enemies so, in addition to everything else, Slevin has to worry about getting caught in any potential crossfire if he can't pay Nick's gambling debts.
 
Throw in the professional hit man (Bruuce Willis Sin City) that both gansters are trying to hire to hit the other's operation and the requisite 'dirty' cop (Stanley Tucci The Hoax) and we've got quite the interesting story here.
 
It's not all bad for Slevin, however, there is the pretty neighbor of Nick's from across the hall (Lucy Liu Code Name:The Cleaner) with whom he falls madly in love. Sound corny? Yep, it is, but Lucy Liu is likeable onscreen you tend to look past the awkardness of introducing a romantic angle for our hero, though when the story unfolds and there is the big 'reveal', we do understand why Slevin is so open to the tenderness he unexpectedly gets from his new significant other.
 
A pretty decent flick, and fun, too.    

SUSPECT ZERO (2004)

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
dvdcoversuspectzero.jpg
Directed by E. Elias Merhige. Starring: Aaron Eckhart, Ben Kingsley, Carrie-Ann Moss, Harry Lennix, Kevin Chamberlin.Drama/Sci-Fi. Synopsis: A federal agent recently demoted to an office in New Mexico believes that a series of murders are actually a roving serial killer who is targeting serial killers.  

This one was pretty good, but could have been better, in my opinion. The premise is pretty complex. A federal agent who has previously had issues (Aaron Eckhart Thank You For Smoking)  lands in an office in the back water of New Mexico and and immediately gets involved in the investigation into the murder of a traveling salesman (Kevin Chamberlin Lucky Slevin). He also has to deal with the fact that one of the agents he will be working is a woman (Carrie Anne-Moss) he had a relationship with at his previous assignment when he engaged in conduct that put his career in jeopardy.

He soon lears that the victim in the crime he is investigating was himself a serial killer and comes to believe that he is chasing "Suspect Zero", a theoretical serial killer who targets serial killers. Now, that is quite a theory and quite an interesting plot, especially since his boss (Harry Lennix Chrystal) thinks his theory is crazy. It turns out that Suspect Zero is real, in the form of a former government agent named O'Ryan (Ben Kingsley Blood Rayne Lucky Number Slevin) , who was part of a top secret project, called remote viewing, which allowed agents to "view" remote locations and events without actually being present.

O.k., that is a little hard to buy but, apparently, it is/was an actual military project, according to the special features on the DVD. And, in the flick, O'Ryan uses his "ability" to target and then kill...serial killers.

Its the combination of these two potentially interesting stories that I don't think works well cinematically.I guess you need a reason why someone can track and kill serial killers, all of who are depicted as being active serial killers who are not under suspicion for their deeds. But, as far as the flick is concerned, I just don't thnk it worked as well as it could have if the movie has stayed with the premise of a serial killer killing serial killers, which is an extrememly interesting story, or even the remote viewing angle.

The movie does not suffer due to any fault of the actors, Kingsley is simmering evil in his portrayal of O'Ryan and, in my opinion, with a better story, this could have been a flick for the ages. The way its set up, however, O'Ryan is to loosely portrayed as villian, hero, and victim. I think the film needed to pick one. Further, not enough was done in the flick to really develop or provide depth to the "remote viewing" angle, which I think tended to move this movie-undeservedly so-into the campy sci-fi area.

The acting is to good for that area but, I'm sorry, if you're going to make a movie where someone has the ability to see things happening hundreds of miles away, you've got to really provide a solid back story and I don't think the film did that, hence my suggestion that it should have stuck with one of its major themes. Even if you buy the remote viewing theme as told, it still does not explain O'Ryan's detailed knowledge of the people he stalks...its not like he has remote hearing as well.

Like I said, the acting is good, Eckhart is certainly a quality lead and Moss does fine, too, I did buy the chemistry between them though I felt the romance angle was unnecessary as far as the story line.

But, that is just my opinion.      

BLOOD RAYNE (2005)

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

dvdcoverbloodrayne.jpgDirected by Uwe Boll. Starring Kristanna Loken, Michelle Rodriguez, Ben Kingsley, Matthew Davis, Michael Madsen, Billy Zane. Action/Horror.  Synopsis: A story of a half human half vampire woman who leads a group of humans against the strongest vampire and his clan of vampires, the head vampire happens to be her father. Based on a popular video game.

I'll admit, the box cover of this DVD was the driving force behind my deciding to give this movie a shot. I didn't even read the description, although if I had, I would have picked it up anyway because I am a fan of almost all things vampire. Apparently, this is a flick based on a video game of which I am not familiar, though it seems to me that most of the buzz I've heard from folks who have  seen the movie and are familiar with the game pan the movie. Not surprising to me, based on similar reactions when a popular novel is made into a movie. But, I can't, and won't even try, to talk about this movie from the VG perspective, to me they are such separate mediums that it is borderline amazing to successfully capture the best elements of both.

I can say that Blood Rayne tries to be, and is in many ways, unlike most other vampire movies that you are likely to see. First off, in my opinion, it does not even try to be a horror movie. I include that genre in the synopsis only because I try to put as many possible descriptions on a movie as possible, knowing that one person's drama is another person's action and so on. To me, this is an action movie all the way with the vampires being shown to have more "human" characteristics and emotions than in most other adaptations of the vampire legend/franchise. Its also clear that the film was relying a whole lot on special effects to carry the story.

Rayne (Kristanna Loken) is a half human/half vampire (called dhampir) who starts the saga as an unwilling freak show performer in a carnival, being as she has this funny habit of dining on blood, which seems to heal the cuts inflicted on her human skin at the start of the show. Of course, Rayne is fortunate enough to be a sympathetic figure among some of the other performers, including most importantly a fortune teller, who lets Rayne know that it is her destiny to find and destroy Kagan (Ben Kingsley Suspect Zero), the most powerful and diabolical vampire of them all, who leads the murderous vampire clan. It seems Kagan's vamp clan is after a rare gem, which for some reason will make vampires even stronger than they already are.

And there is this little kicker to boot. Kagan is Rayne's dad. Seems that Kagan violated Rayne's human mother. Fortunately, Rayen is that rarest of creatures, a dhampir who actually survives into adulthood, so she is in a unique position to, as they say, exact a measure of revenge, which Rayne is all too happy to do. Believe me, there is no Cosby-esque Daddy/daughter love here.

Fortunately for Rayne, she is not the only one wants a piece of Kagan and his clan, as she teams up with  fellow vampire hunters (Michelle Rodriquez, Michael Madsen, Matthew Davis). The most important of these pals is Davis' Sebastian, as he becomes Rayne's love interest and they combine for the film's only gratuitous sex scene. (Notice I did not say "love scene")  

The nuances of the plot are somewhat indecipherable and, there will be some cheesy dialogue there for you, so those of you who go into each and every movie looking to critique it against the Citizen Kane standard will have plenty to talk about. The setting is ambiguous, I suppose its set in the Middle Ages times, so I just decided to suspend disbelief a lot with the costumes, as Loken and Rodriguez are dressed in tight, revealing tops that you would expect to see in a Showtime late night bawdy flick...but I wasn't complaining.

Visually, the movie is way above par for its look and effects. We see the vamps going out in different ways than usual, although as a dedicated vampire fan, it seems to me that one of the staples of the franchise is that you have to play by the basic set of rules, whether the vampire is Count Dracula himself in Transylvania as in Bram Stoker's Dracula or hippie looking teenagers hanging out near a California amusement park as in The Lost Boys. That is, there are only a couple of ways to kill a vampire. So, what's this with all of the sword fighting? What the hell use is a sword against a vampire, unless you always manage to pierce his/her heart with it? And why would a vampire have a sword? And, of course, the biggest question: when did vampires start doing the actual deed? I mean, isn't it just accepted that their sucking of the blood is the symbolic replacement for having, shall we say, "relations"?

And, even when movies do imply that the vamp does the deed, its always in conjunction with his wanting his human partner to join him in the world of the undead (like in Blacula) . What I'm driving at here is, why didn't Kagan drink Rayne's mother's blood, what's up with that? 'Cause if he had, then Rayne would have been a full blooded (pun intended) vampire, right? Well, maybe I missed something or I'm just putting too much thought into this.

Anyway, you won't see superior acting in this one, notwithstanding the presence of Oscar-winner Ben Kingsley, who looks outlandish in his wig and seems strangely wooden, not scary or creepy like he did in Suspect Zero. Billy Zane (Titanic) in his cameo and Michelle Rodriguez are the best of the lot. Michael Madsen comes across as if he took this part to have some fun more than anything. Loken is not going to make anyone forget Meryl Streep with her acting, but I think its a little unfair to banish her completely to the "Eye Candy/ Can't Act Group". Like her role in Terminator 3, there is no doubt that her principal purpose is to look sexy but tough and be believable as an action hero, and she does that very well.

Here she has a lot of dialogue, most of it cheesy, but she brings energy to it and has some screen presence. I just think it's kind of hard to pull off this kind of role and really impress with your acting. I think Charlize or Halle might be able to do it, but there is a reason that those two have statues on their shelves, not too many other bombshells could do it, if any. Loken is not bad and, over time, if she ever has some real serious roles in a widely seen movie where she has a real chance to show some depth, a lot of viewers might be surprised, because I think she has some talent.

On the whole, can't say this is a good film, the story is incredulous even for its genre, the acting is mediocre, the directing is uneven, but it does try to step outside of the box somewhat and there are some good scenes and nice effects. You've seen better movies, no doubt. But you've seen a lot worse, no doubt. If you like a little special effects gore, vampire movies, or any of the main actors, lower your expectations, buy it/rent it when its reduced in price, have some popcorn and kill some time when you're bored. 

You could do worse. And you probably have.         
History Channel DVD Pre-Orders

Categories

Powered by Movable Type 4.31-en

About this Archive

This page is an archive of recent entries in the Ben Kingsley category.

Anthony Hopkins is the previous category.

Benecio Del Toro is the next category.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



Shop the Official Bio Store



Shop the Official A&E Store